Skip Navigation

The Cambridge Quarterly 2005 34(4):365-385; doi:10.1093/camqtly/bfi039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abbott, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author, 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Cambridge Quarterly. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

PRIZE ESSAY

The Cambridge Quarterly endows a prize for the best dissertation submitted for the final Cambridge University English honours examination. The article printed below is the text of the Prize Essay for 2005.

T. S. Eliot’s Ghostly Footfalls: The Versification of Four Quartets

Ruth Abbott

Ruth Abbott recently graduated from Clare College, Cambridge with the highest starred First in her year in English. She is continuing her research into versification under Dr Simon Jarvis.

This article explores the versification of T. S. Eliot’s Four Quartets, demonstrating the alignment of its dialectical quality with Eliot’s own writings on scepticism, wit and drama. The pattern of Four Quartets is shown to be a dramatic one, populated with ghostly characters, who are not so much dramatic personae as dramatic versifications; much of this pattern is formed by sceptical dalectic between different uses of versification as a custom or habit. But this scepticism becomes a self-critical search for a poetic mode of truth. Into the pattern of self-conscious self-parodies, Eliot weaves moments of profound distraction, in which verse is inhabited, and becomes a kind of incarnation.

‘Skilled verse is the art of a profound sceptic’.1

Time present and time past

Are both perhaps present in time future

And time future contained in time past.

If all time is eternally present

All time is unredeemable.2


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.