Skip Navigation

The Cambridge Quarterly 2004 33(1):1-10; doi:10.1093/camqtly/33.1.1
© 2004 by Cambridge Quarterly
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosslyn, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Literature for the Masses: The English Literature Degree in 2004

Felicity Rosslyn

University of Leicester

After the twenty-year expansion of the university system, what claim can still be made for the English Literature degree as a ‘discipline’? What actually goes on in a contemporary seminar? This article reflects on three real-life encounters with students reading Shakespeare, Bunyan and Solzhenitsyn.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PedagogyHome page
S. Bruce, K. Jones, and M. McLean
Some Notes on a Project: Democracy and Authority in the Production of a Discipline
Pedagogy, October 1, 2007; 7(3): 481 - 500.
[PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.